Subletting a rented flat to someone other than its owner

By Nazir Ayyad

حكم تأجير العين المستأجرة لشخص آخر غير مالكها

A question about a man who rented a residential flat and wished to let it to someone other than its owner; Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya answered that a tenant may sublet the rented property without blame in sharia, provided the second lease causes no damage to the property, that the property is of a kind whose use does not vary from person to person, and that the second rent may exceed the first, though it is preferable that the tenant has added something to the property that justifies asking more, to avoid the disagreement of those jurists who require it; all of this is conditional on not breaching the agreement with the owner and on complying with the laws that govern the tenancy and their restrictions. Dar al-Ifta set out the legitimacy of leasing from the Qur'an, the Sunna and consensus, attributed the permissibility of a tenant's subletting to the majority of Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi'is and, on the sounder view, Hanbalis, and to a group of early jurists, and explained it by the tenant's having acquired ownership of the use through the first lease, so he may dispose of it, and by the analogy that a lease is like a sale and sold goods may be resold once taken into possession. It reported the Hanafi condition that where the second rent is higher the tenant must have improved the property, otherwise he gives the excess in charity, quoted al-Kasani, Ibn Maza, al-Hattab, al-Shirazi and al-Buhuti, and referred to article 593 of the Egyptian Civil Code and to article 18 of Law 136 of 1981, which allows the owner to seek eviction when a tenant under an old-rent contract sublets without express written permission.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Summary

A question about a tenant letting the flat he rented to someone other than its owner, in which Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya answered that this is permissible in sharia according to the majority of jurists, provided it does not harm the property and the property is of a kind whose use does not vary from person to person; a higher second rent is allowed, though adding something to the property is preferable, and all of this is bound by the agreement with the owner and by the laws governing tenancy. 1

The question

The questioner asked: a man has rented a residential flat; may he let it to another person who is not its owner? 1

The answer

Dar al-Ifta began with the legitimacy of leasing, which people greatly need, defining it with al-Khatib al-Shirbini in Mughni al-Muhtaj (3/438) as a contract over an intended, known use that can be granted and permitted, for a known consideration, and with article 558 of the Civil Code; it grounded its permissibility in al-Talaq 6, in the hadith of Aisha in Sahih al-Bukhari that the Prophet ﷺ and Abu Bakr hired a man of Banu al-Dil as a guide, in the consensus of the scholars on its permissibility when its elements are met, as Ibn Qudama says in al-Mughni (5/321), and in their consensus on the permissibility of renting houses when the period, the rent and the occupant are specified, as reported by Ibn al-Mundhir in al-Ishraf (6/303). 1

It then ruled that letting the rented property to someone other than the lessor is permissible in sharia according to the majority of Hanafis, Malikis, Shafi'is and, on the sounder view, Hanbalis, and that permissibility is also reported from Sa'id ibn al-Musayyib, Abu Salama ibn Abd al-Rahman, al-Nakha'i, al-Sha'bi, Mujahid, Ikrima, Ibn Sirin and al-Thawri; the permissibility applies where the use of the property does not vary from person to person and the second lease causes it no damage. 1 It explained the permissibility by the fact that the tenant acquired ownership of the property's use through the first lease, ownership attaching to a use as it attaches to a thing, so he may dispose of it and take it either himself or through a deputy, and by the analogy that a lease is like a sale and sold goods may be resold after they are taken into possession, unless the parties agree otherwise or the second lease causes damage. 1 It noted that the jurists allow the second rent to be lower than, equal to or higher than the first, but that the Hanafis require, where the second rent is higher, that the tenant add something to the property to match the increase, failing which he gives the excess in charity while the lease remains valid; it quoted al-Kasani in Bada'i' al-Sana'i' (4/206), Ibn Maza in al-Muhit al-Burhani (7/429), al-Hattab in Mawahib al-Jalil (5/417) citing al-Mudawwana, al-Shirazi in al-Muhadhdhab (2/258) and al-Buhuti in Kashshaf al-Qina' (3/565). 1

Dar al-Ifta said that the use of residential flats generally does not vary from person to person, and subletting them causes no damage beyond the ordinary, so the default is permissibility, unless the flat is let to someone who will use it for something other than residence, such as a trade or a business; it referred to article 593 of the Egyptian Civil Code, Law 131 of 1948, which allows a tenant to assign the lease or sublet unless the agreement provides otherwise, and required compliance with the laws governing tenancy and their restrictions, among them article 18 of Law 136 of 1981, which allows the owner under an old-rent contract to seek eviction when it is established that the tenant sublet the property without his express written permission. 1

It concluded that a tenant may let the rented property without blame in sharia, provided this does not harm the property and the property is of a kind whose use does not vary from person to person; the second rent may be higher, though adding something to the property is preferable to avoid the disagreement; and all of this is conditional on not breaching the agreement with the owner and on complying with the governing laws, so the man may let the flat he rented to someone other than its owner, observing the sharia and legal rules. 1

About this record

Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya published this fatwa on dar-alifta.org as no. 9022, dated 12 July 2026, in the category of earning, among the fatwas of the Grand Mufti Nazir Muhammad Ayyad. 1 The museum records this text as a historical document attributed to the body or scholar that issued it; it issues no ruling of its own.

Connections

Explore the connections

About
Lease and hire (ijara)· The contract (aqd): elements, offer and acceptance, and its kinds

People and things also explored

Court compensation for an employee who left a fixed-term contract· Muwatta 1782· Muwatta 1799· Muwatta 1830· Muwatta 1837· Muwatta 1839· Muwatta 1841· Muwatta 2004

Sources

  1. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta (dar-alifta.org) , fatwa 9022

Original page

Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Subletting a rented flat to someone other than its owner”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/fatwa-dar-alifta-subletting-a-rented-flat/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-02.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

Court compensation for an employee who left a fixed-term contract

A question about court compensation for an employee who left a fixed-term contract, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that the employee may claim the rights labour law guarantees him and take the compensation the judge awarded, except the legal interest, if his claim involved no lying or forgery. The Department answered that the principle is that a contract is the law of the contracting parties, so its terms must be respected, citing Surat al-Ma'ida 5:1 and a hadith that al-Bukhari cites in suspended form with certainty, whose meaning is that Muslims are bound by their conditions. It said the employee may claim the compensation that labour law sets for arbitrary dismissal, since the law was made to protect the interests of both worker and employer, a ruler's measures are tied to the public interest, and the law has the standing of general custom; what is customary counts as stipulated, so its provisions are implicitly part of every employment contract in the country. It concluded that he may take what the judge awarded under the law, provided there was no lying or forgery, except the legal interest; piety suggests that if he sees the award as larger than the harm he suffered, he takes the equivalent of his harm and leaves the rest.