The Jurists' Consultation on Cyprus

مشاورة الفقهاء في أمر قبرس

In al-Baladhuri from Syrian scholars and Abu Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Sallam: the people of Cyprus gave fresh offence while Abd al-Malik ibn Salih ibn Ali the Abbasid governed the marches, and he wished to annul their treaty — the jurists being accessible — so he wrote to al-Layth ibn Sa'd, Malik ibn Anas, Sufyan ibn Uyayna, Musa ibn A'yun, Isma'il ibn Ayyash, Yahya ibn Hamza, Abu Ishaq al-Fazari and Makhlad ibn al-Husayn about their case and they answered him; among their rulings: al-Layth ibn Sa'd — they are suspected of betraying the Muslims and counselling the Byzantines; I hold you should denounce the treaty and give them a year's grace to choose — whoever wishes may join the Muslims' lands as a dhimmi paying kharaj, whoever wishes may withdraw to Byzantine lands, and whoever would stay in Cyprus stays at war; Malik ibn Anas — their safe-conduct is ancient and successive governors have honoured it, I find none who annulled their treaty, and hold you should not hasten to denounce it until the proof stands against them; Sufyan ibn Uyayna — we know of no people God covenanted with who broke the covenant without their blood becoming lawful, save the people of Mecca; Musa ibn A'yun — I have seen none of our predecessors annul them and hold they should be kept to their terms, transmitting from al-Awza'i that a dhimmi who guided the polytheists to the Muslims' weakness has left his dhimma, while a mere treaty-people is denounced openly; Isma'il ibn Ayyash — they are a humbled, conquered people whom the Byzantines master over their own lives and women, so it is our duty to defend and protect them and keep them on their covenant; Yahya ibn Hamza — Cyprus's case is that of Arabasus, where Umayr ibn Sa'd reported to Umar and Umar offered them double their wealth or expulsion, and when they refused he exiled them a year then ruined it — they are people of ransom, not of dhimma; Abu Ishaq al-Fazari and Makhlad ibn al-Husayn — nothing resembles Cyprus's case but Arabasus and Umar's ruling in it, transmitting from al-Awza'i that Cyprus's treaty was fourteen thousand dinars, seven to the Muslims and seven to the Byzantines, and that their treaty cannot be annulled save for an act in which their treachery is known.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Early Abbasid Caliphate
Region
Levant & Iraq
Review
Draft Completeness 2/5 · Help complete it

Overview

Al-Baladhuri, in "Futuh al-Buldan", reports from some scholars of Syria and from Abu Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Salam that the people of Cyprus created an incident during the governorship of Abd al-Malik ibn Salih over the frontiers. He wanted to break their treaty, and wrote to the jurists of his time to ask their opinion. 1

The jurists consulted

Those named are al-Layth ibn Sa'd, Malik ibn Anas, Sufyan ibn Uyayna, Musa ibn A'yan, Isma'il ibn Ayyash, Yahya ibn Hamza, Abu Ishaq al-Fazari and Mukhallad ibn al-Husayn. 1

Their answers

  • Al-Layth ibn Sa'd accuses them of deceiving the Muslims and conspiring with the Romans, and holds that the covenant should be cast off toward them and that they be given a year to choose between staying as protected subjects, joining the land of the Romans, or continuing the war. 1
  • Malik ibn Anas holds that their safe conduct is old and was confirmed by the governors, and that the covenant should not be broken hastily until proof is established against them. 1
  • Sufyan ibn Uyayna knows of no people who broke a covenant with God and were not then made lawful to kill, except the people of Mecca. 1
  • Musa ibn A'yan holds to keep faith with them on their condition, and reports from al-Awza'i that a protected subject who guides the polytheists to the weak points of the Muslims leaves his protection, and that the people of a treaty are notified on equal terms. 1
  • Isma'il ibn Ayyash sees them as subdued and overcome by the Romans, so it is right for the Muslims to protect them and keep them to their covenant. 1
  • Yahya ibn Hamza compares their case to that of Arabsus in the days of Umar, and says they are a people of ransom, not a people of protection. 1
  • Abu Ishaq al-Fazari and Mukhallad ibn al-Husayn see nothing like the case of Cyprus except Arabsus. They report from al-Awza'i that Cyprus was reconciled for fourteen thousand dinars, seven for the Muslims and seven for the Romans, and that a treaty is not broken except by an order in which their treachery is known. 1

The answers are given here as al-Baladhuri relates them, and some concern the rules of the protected status. The museum does not judge between these opinions. What is not covered here: the governor's final decision, which needs an additional source.

Connections

Explore the connections

Had participant
Abd al-Malik ibn Salih· Abu Ishaq al-Fazari· Isma'il ibn Ayyash· al-Layth ibn Sa'd· Sufyan ibn Uyayna· Malik ibn Anas
Basis for
Dhimma (the covenant of protection)

People and things also explored

Muwatta 762· Jizya (capitation on treaty peoples)· al-Awza'i's Letter to Salih ibn Ali· The Conquest of al-Raqqa· The Conquest of Edessa (al-Ruha)· The Treaty with the People of Maqna· The Treaty with the Jarajima· The Treaty with the Samaritans

Sources

  1. Futuh al-Buldan — al-Baladhuri (Mu'assasat al-Ma'arif edition)
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “The Jurists' Consultation on Cyprus”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/event/fuqaha-consulta-on-cyprus/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-16.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Time

Eras, timelines, this day in history, any year in the Islamic world.
Related

Muwatta 762