al-Tadmuri Taj al-Din Ishaq ibn Ibrahim

التدمري تاج الدين إسحاق بن إبراهيم

1430 CE · 833 AH

Scholar included in the Maliki biographical dictionaries; died 833 AH (1430 CE).

Depth

At a glance

Roles
Scholar · Jurist
Counted among
Sunni
Era
The Mongol and Post-Mongol Era
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Life in time

135013751400142514501475150015251550 c. c. c.
The Crusades, Ayyubids and Mamluks · The Gunpowder Empires · The Mongol and Post-Mongol Era Contemporaries: Abd al-Baqi Yazdi · Abd al-Rahman al-Tha'alibi · Taj al-Din 'Abd al-Wahhab ibn 'Arabshah · Abu Zayyan Muhammad V, Marinid Sultan · Shihab al-Din Ibn 'Ubba al-Maqdisi

Development of law, theology and institutions

Place in the story

  • JuristTradition

Roles are dated and sourced; the museum describes the act and attributes the judgement.

Overview

Taj al-Din Ishaq ibn Ibrahim ibn Ahmad al-Tadmuri, a scholar and jurist whose biography appears in the books of the Maliki classes. He died in 833 AH (1430 CE). 1

His birthplace, teachers and works need an additional source, and his year of death needs a second source.

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. Mawsu'at A'lam al-Ulama' wa-l-Adaba' al-Arab wa-l-Muslimin — Dar al-Jil / ALECSO
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “al-Tadmuri Taj al-Din Ishaq ibn Ibrahim”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/person/al-tadmuri-taj-al-din-ishaq-ibn-ibrahim/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-16.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

People

Prophets, companions, scholars, rulers, scientists, poets, travelers: women and men who shaped the story.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.