Tashahhud (the testimony sitting in prayer)

التشهد

The tashahhud is the set of words said in the sitting of prayer, named for its two testimonies. In the sitting not followed by the salam (the first), it is obligatory for the Hanafis on the sound view, for the Malikis in one view and for the Hanbali school, and a sunna for the Malikis in their school view, the Shafiis and one Hanbali narration. The last sitting is obligatory for the Hanafis, a sunna for the Malikis in their school view, and a pillar for the Shafiis and Hanbalis. The best wording is the version taught to Ibn Masud for the Hanafis and Hanbalis, Umar's for the Malikis, and Ibn Abbas's for the Shafiis. Saying it quietly is the sunna. Omitting it in the first sitting by forgetfulness requires the forgetfulness prostration; deliberate omission is disputed. 1 2 3 4 5

Depth

At a glance

Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 2/5 · Help complete it

Worship and the pillarsScripture and its sciences

Overview

Tashahhud is the set of words said in the sitting of prayer, named for its two testimonies. 1

Definition and general ruling

The word is used for saying the formula of unity and for the words read in the sitting. Ibn Abidin says it names the collected words transmitted from Ibn Masud and others, named for containing the two testimonies. 1

The first sitting

The tashahhud in the sitting not followed by the salam is obligatory for the Hanafis on the sound view, for the Malikis in one view, and for the Hanbali school, since omitting it requires the forgetfulness prostration. 1 2 It is a sunna for the Hanafis in one view, for the Malikis in their school view, and for the Shafiis and a Hanbali narration, since it falls away through forgetfulness like the sunnas. 2

The last sitting

The tashahhud in the last sitting is obligatory for the Hanafis, who make the sitting itself the duty. The Maliki school holds it a sunna, with one view that it is obligatory. 2 The Shafiis and Hanbalis hold it a pillar of prayer. 2 3

The wording

The Hanafis and Hanbalis prefer the version the Prophet ﷺ taught to Ibn Masud, which has the conjunction in one line; this is the view of al-Thawri, Ishaq and Abu Thawr. 3 The Malikis prefer the tashahhud of Umar, which he recited from the pulpit without objection and so became a consensus. 3 The Shafiis prefer the version from Ibn Abbas. 3 The difference is one of preference: any version authentically reported from the Prophet is valid. 3 The worshipper intends the meanings of the words as an act of address, not as a report of the ascension. 6

Additions, omissions and order

The Hanafis dislike, as forbidden, adding a letter or beginning with one letter before another; the Malikis dislike additions. 6 The Shafiis hold that some words are sunna and not conditions, and the order is recommended. 6 The Hanbalis hold that dropping a word missing in some versions is valid in the sounder view; in another narration, omitting a conjunction or a letter requires repeating the prayer. 6

Sitting, languages and quiet recitation

The first sitting is a sunna for the Malikis, Shafiis and Hanbalis and, on the sounder Hanafi view, obligatory; the sitting for the last tashahhud is a pillar. 4 Saying it in another language is allowed for one who cannot manage Arabic, and disputed for one who can. 4 The sunna is to say it quietly, since the Prophet did not say it aloud, and Ibn Masud said: «quiet tashahhud is the sunna». 4

Effect of omission

All agree that omitting the first tashahhud by forgetfulness requires the forgetfulness prostration. If done deliberately, the Hanafis and one Hanbali view require repeating the prayer, while the Malikis, Shafiis and another Hanbali narration require the prostration. 4 Omitting the last tashahhud deliberately requires repeating the prayer for the Hanafis, Shafiis and Hanbalis, and for the Malikis in one view. 4 5

Blessing on the Prophet in the sitting

Most jurists do not add the blessing on the Prophet in the first sitting; the Shafiis in the more likely view recommend it there. 5 In the last sitting there is no dispute that it is lawful. 5

People and things also explored

Command, prohibition and capacity· The ruling on one who abandons prayer· Ada' (performance of an obligation within its time)· Adhan (the call to prayer: its ruling, wording, conditions, recommended features and the muezzin)· Bone (adhm): purity, use and retaliation· The adornment of desires and the goods of this world· The people of the bench (ahl al-suffa)· The seven ahruf

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5198
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5199
  3. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5200
  4. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5202
  5. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5203
  6. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.5201
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Tashahhud (the testimony sitting in prayer)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/tashahhud-testimony-in-prayer/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Living

Practices, the Islamic year, festivals, food, dress and music by region.
Related

Command, prohibition and capacity

The duty of complying with prohibitions by avoidance, and with commands according to one's capacity; in Abu Hurayra's hadith 'what I forbid you, avoid, and what I command you, do of it what you can' — its occasion, per Ibn Rajab, being the questioner who asked when hajj was imposed 'every year?' until he said it three times and was told 'had I said yes it would have been obligatory and you could not have managed'; Ibn Rajab derives from it the prohibition of asking about what is not needed, of asking out of obstinacy, frivolity or mockery, of asking about what God has hidden from His servants, and of questions on the lawful and unlawful that might draw stricter rulings, noting that licence to ask was for bedouins and delegations, not the residents of Medina; and in Abu Sa'id al-Khudri's hadith — the thirty-fourth — the three grades of changing evil by hand, then tongue, then heart, according to capacity, that being the weakest of faith, corroborated by Ibn Masud's report that whoever struggles against the successors who say what they do not do with hand, tongue or heart is a believer, and beyond the heart there is not a mustard-seed of faith (pp. 218–222, 698–699).