Consensus (ijma')

إجماع

In the lexicon ijma' means resolve, and sometimes agreement. For the usulis it is the agreement of all the mujtahids of the community after the Prophet ﷺ's time on a matter of law. 1 It is a definitive proof when the recognised scholars agree that it is a consensus; it is not used to prove what its own validity depends on, such as God's existence or the Prophet's mission. 2

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 0/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Summary

In the lexicon ijma' means resolve, and sometimes agreement. For the usulis it is the agreement of all the mujtahids of the community after the Prophet's time on a matter of law. 1 It is a definitive proof when the recognised scholars agree that it is a consensus; it is not used to prove what its own validity depends on, such as God's existence or the Prophet's mission. 2

Who makes up the consensus

The majority of Sunnis hold that consensus is formed by the agreement of mujtahids; the opinion of others does not count. The disagreement of innovators counts unless their innovation is one that takes them out of the community; the extreme Rafidah, for example, are excluded. 1 2

Authority and silent consensus

Consensus is definitive when the recognised scholars agree that it is consensus, and not when they differ, as in a silent consensus or where a dissent is rare. Some doubted that it can be transmitted. 2

Scope and basis

Consensus may be used for religious matters, of belief or practice; rational matters are settled by definitive proofs. Every consensus must rest on a text or an analogy, even a hidden one. 2

Consensus, abrogation and ranking

Consensus cannot abrogate or be abrogated by consensus, since consensus happens only after the Prophet's death. When it contradicts a text, it shows that the text is abrogated. Al-Ghazali ranks consensus above the Qur'an and Sunna in the search for proof; Abu Hashim al-Jubba'i takes it as a proof but not a consensus; al-Shafi'i and others deny that it is a proof. 3

Sheikh Omar Abdelkafy's use of the consensus

He cites the consensus of the Companions in the matter of fighting those who withheld zakat, and says rulings are taken from the Qur'an, the Sunna and the consensus of the Companions. 4 He asks whether Abu Bakr was wrong to fight those who withheld zakat, and says Umar, Ali and others agreed with him. 4 (needs_source: the full list of names is not clear in the automatic transcript.)

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1697
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1698
  3. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1699
  4. Assabile archive of Omar Abdelkafy's lectures (audio and video) , Aadau Al Islam, episode 1, at 00:18:30 · Listen at the archive (opens the audio at this time)
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Consensus (ijma')”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ijma/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-25.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.