Children of Gebelawi

By Naguib Mahfouz

أولاد حارتنا

Naguib Mahfouz's allegorical 1959 novel restaging prophetic history in a Cairo alley — controversial enough to be banned in Egypt for years.

Depth

At a glance

Identifiers
Wikidata
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

In time

195019601970
The Colonial Era · The Modern Era

LiteratureProphets

Overview

The novel by Naguib Mahfouz (1959), which provoked the greatest Arabic literary controversy of the twentieth century. Allegorical characters of an Egyptian alley echo the stories of the prophets from Adam to Muhammad, passing through Moses and Jesus, so that the history of religions is read as the history of a popular quarter. 1

Legacy

It was banned from publication as a book in Egypt until it was printed in Beirut and then Cairo, and it has been translated into dozens of languages; today it is read as a key to the relationship between religion and politics in the modern Arab imagination. 1

People and things also explored

Abraham and the one who argued with him about his Lord· al-Amin, the Trustworthy (the Prophet's title before his mission)· Delivery of the message and the limit of the Prophet's charge· Raising the foundations of the House: who built the Ka'ba· al-Tanahmir: the Himyaritic speech remnant· The religious bequest: submission until death· Aljamia (aljamiado: Spanish written in Arabic script, and its literature)· Arab naming of children after plants

Sources

  1. Wikidata
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Children of Gebelawi”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/awlad-haratina/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-17.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Related

Abraham and the one who argued with him about his Lord

Sha'rawi reads the one who argued with Abraham about his Lord as the agent of the argument, with Abraham as its object. He declines to name him, holds that the vagueness is intended so the lesson applies in every age, and answers those who name him. He reports that Abraham moved the argument from giving life and death to the rising of the sun.