Is seclusion or company better for the seeker?

هل الأفضل للسالك العزلة أم الخلطة؟

Ibn Taymiyya was asked whether seclusion or company is better for the seeker. He answered that people disputed over it either in general or according to circumstances; that company is obligatory or recommended when it is cooperation in righteousness and piety and forbidden when it is cooperation in sin; that the servant needs times of solitude; and that choosing company absolutely is a mistake, as is choosing solitude absolutely.

Depth

At a glance

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

Spirituality and SufismEthics and character

Summary

Volume 10 of Majmu' al-Fatawa contains an answer by Ibn Taymiyya to the question: is seclusion or company better for the seeker? 1 2 He begins by noting that people dispute over it either in general terms or according to circumstances, then states that company is sometimes obligatory or recommended, and that one and the same person may be commanded to mix with people at one time and to be alone at another. 1

The rule: cooperation in good or in sin

The gist for him is that company involving cooperation in righteousness and piety is commanded, and company involving cooperation in sin and aggression is forbidden. 1 Mixing with Muslims in acts of worship – the five prayers, Friday, the two feasts, the eclipse prayer and the prayer for rain – is among what God and His Messenger commanded, as is mixing with them in pilgrimage and in campaigns, even if the leaders of these are wicked and even if there are wicked people in those gatherings. 1 To this belongs every gathering by which the servant grows in faith, either by benefiting from it or by benefiting others. 3

Times of solitude

On the other side he holds that the servant must have times when he is alone with himself in his supplication, remembrance, prayer, reflection, self-examination and the mending of his heart, and in matters particular to him that no one else shares – either in his house, as Tawus said, "What a fine hermitage a man's house is: in it he restrains his eyes and his tongue", or outside it. 3

Conclusion

Ibn Taymiyya says: "Choosing company absolutely is a mistake, and choosing solitude absolutely is a mistake"; how much of each a person needs, and what is best for him in each state, requires particular judgement. 3

Using means and leaving them

He applies the same reasoning to taking up means of livelihood: one who is able to use a means without its distracting him from what is more beneficial for his religion is commanded to do so, with reliance on God, and this is better for him than taking from people even if it comes without asking; if he uses a means without a sound intention or without reliance on God, he is obedient in neither. He then makes an exception for the poor who are confined in the path of God. 3

Not yet covered

The words of those who preferred seclusion or company absolutely, from their own books (such as the chapters on seclusion in the books of renunciation), and Ibn Taymiyya's discussion of innovated retreats have not yet been added; see the retreat (khalwa).

Opinions on the question

The question: Weighing withdrawal from people against mixing with them on the path of worship.

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni (Hanbali)Main reference

It depends on whether company is cooperation in good or in sin; times of solitude are indispensable

He counts mixing with Muslims in the prayers, Friday, the two feasts, pilgrimage and campaigns as commanded even if the leaders are wicked, quotes Tawus – 'What a fine hermitage a man's house is' – and holds that choosing either absolutely is a mistake.

Held by: Ibn Taymiyya

Basis: Majmu' Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyya, compiled and arranged by Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, vol. 10 ('Ilm al-Suluk), King Fahd Complex, 1425 AH / 2004 Majmu' al-Fatawa vol. 10 pp. 425–426

More opinions (1)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Secondary opinion

Preferring seclusion absolutely, or company absolutely

Ibn Taymiyya notes that people disputed over the question in general terms, that is, by preferring one of the two absolutely; he does not name the holders here.

Basis: Majmu' Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyya, compiled and arranged by Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, vol. 10 ('Ilm al-Suluk), King Fahd Complex, 1425 AH / 2004 Majmu' al-Fatawa vol. 10 p. 425

Connections

Explore the connections

Related to
Khalwa (spiritual retreat)

People and things also explored

Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din· Tasawwuf· Khalwa (spiritual retreat)· Relief after hardship (al-faraj ba'd al-shidda)· Tabattul (withdrawal from the world)· Poverty (faqr) in Sufi ethics· Fleeing to God (firar)· Slackening of the soul in obedience (futur)

Sources

  1. Majmu' Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyya, compiled and arranged by Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, vol. 10 ('Ilm al-Suluk), King Fahd Complex, 1425 AH / 2004 , p. 425
  2. Majmu' Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyya, compiled and arranged by Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, vol. 10 ('Ilm al-Suluk), King Fahd Complex, 1425 AH / 2004 , p. 773
  3. Majmu' Fatawa Shaykh al-Islam Ahmad ibn Taymiyya, compiled and arranged by Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Qasim, vol. 10 ('Ilm al-Suluk), King Fahd Complex, 1425 AH / 2004 , p. 426
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Is seclusion or company better for the seeker?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/is-seclusion-better-than-company-for-the-seeker/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-04.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din

Al-Ghazali's four-rub' masterpiece of forty books — worship, habit, the destroyers, the saviours — which al-Nawawi judged could replace all Islam's books; a Maghrebi denouncer of it famously repented after a dream, Ibn al-Jawzi collected its slips in Ilam al-Ahya', and al-Iraqi sifted its hadiths in 751. In his preface al-Ghazali says he wrote it because the knowledge of the path to the hereafter had become forgotten, and that it treats the knowledge of conduct (mu'amala), not the knowledge of unveiling (mukashafa).