At a glance
- Era
- The Early Abbasid Caliphate
- Region
- Global / Diaspora
- Review
- Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it
Summary
Khusuma is lexically dispute, argument and victory by proof; the jurists use it for bringing a claim before the judge. 1 It differs from enmity, a purpose lodged in the heart to harm or avenge; disputing is speech, enmity is an act of the heart. 12 The Hanafis define a claim as an accepted statement before the judge seeking a right against another or defending one's own, so for them claim and dispute coincide; the Shafiis define it as news of a right against another before a ruler. 2 A dispute is of two kinds: one in which a party stands alone, as one whose admission would bind him is a disputant when he denies; and one needing another party, as in deposit, loan, hire, pledge and usurpation. 2 Rule: a claimant is a disputant if his admission would bind; a respondent whose admission cannot bind (a claim for debt against a minor's guardian) is not a disputant by denying. 2
People and things also explored
Ahliyya (legal capacity: to have rights and duties, and to act; its stages from the womb to full maturity, and what impairs it)· Democracy and the Sharia — compatibility and conflict· Fatwa on the satellite channels — its benefit and harm· Secularism and Islam — conflict or concord· Stoning (rajm) as a penalty for zina· Allusion to a proposal during the waiting period· Aman (safe-conduct granted to enemies in war)· Amana (trust, deposit and what is entrusted)
Sources
- al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.7650
- al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.7651
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Khusuma (dispute and litigation)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/khusuma-fiqh/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.