Istiwa (God's rising over the Throne)

الاستواء على العرش

Sha'rawi holds that istiwa attributed to God is not to be understood in the human sense, because God's attributes are not like those of creatures. He asks that the verse be affirmed while God is declared free of likeness 1.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

Creed

Summary

Sha'rawi warns against reading the istiwa attributed to God in the human sense. God's attributes are not like the attributes of creatures: as God's life, knowledge and power are not measured by human life, knowledge and power, so istiwa is not measured by human sitting 1.

The comparison

He notes that kings sit on their thrones and a person sits on a chair, then holds that the word istiwa in God's case is not to be taken as that 1. He argues that God's life is not like human life, and that his knowledge and power are not like human knowledge and power 1.

Reason and limit

He holds that the human mind cannot grasp an act related to God's essence, and so one says "glory be to God" at every act related to God's self 1. He adds that this speech is God's own, and that the speaker is God 1.

Not yet checked

This is Sha'rawi's reading of the verse. The creedal scholars' positions on istiwa and the positions of other schools are not set out here and are not checked. The edition is unverified.

Istiwa in Sheikh Omar Abdelkafy's lessons (episode 1)

The Sheikh cites a well-known saying attributed to Imam Malik on God's istiwa (rising over the Throne): its manner is known, its modality unknown, belief in it is obligatory, and asking about its modality is an innovation (needs_source). 2 He presents this saying as what the believer must hold, and says belief in istiwa is obligatory without delving into its modality (his view). 3

Opinions on the question

The question: How is the attribute of istiwa ascribed to God to be understood without likening God to creatures?

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni view: not yet sourcedMain reference

not yet sourced.
More opinions (3)

speaker's view (Omar Abdelkafy) viewOther opinion

He cites Imam Malik's saying on istiwa and affirms it: affirmation without delving into its modality, and asking about the modality is an innovation (needs_source). 2

academic view: not yet sourced viewSecondary opinion

not yet sourced.

other view: not yet sourced viewOther opinion

not yet sourced.

People and things also explored

The people of the qibla and not declaring takfir for sin· The hereafter: the grave, resurrection and reckoning· Islamic eschatology· Reason and heart· The Throne (al-Arsh)· Al-din al-qayyim (the upright religion)· Absolute unseen (al-ghayb al-mutlaq)· «Be, and it is» (kun fa-yakun): creation by command, not by a mould

Sources

  1. Sha'rawi's Khawatir around the Holy Quran, volume one (scan copy) , p.233
  2. Assabile archive of Omar Abdelkafy's lectures (audio and video) , Tafsir Al Quran Al Qareem, episode 1, at 00:44:00 · Listen at the archive (opens the audio at this time)
  3. Assabile archive of Omar Abdelkafy's lectures (audio and video) , Tafsir Al Quran Al Qareem, episode 1, at 00:43:30 · Listen at the archive (opens the audio at this time)
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Istiwa (God's rising over the Throne)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/istiwa-ala-al-arsh/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-25.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

The people of the qibla and not declaring takfir for sin

al-Tahawi's principle of calling the people of the qibla Muslims and believers so long as they accept what the Prophet brought, and of not declaring any of them an unbeliever for a sin unless he declares it lawful.