The mazalim (courts of grievances)

المظالم

Mazalim — the caliphal grievance institution above the ordinary qadi's remit: al-Mahdi's iron-windowed complaints house and al-Muhtadi's four-doored Dome of Redress 1.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Early Abbasid Caliphate · Abbasid Fragmentation
Region
Levant & Iraq
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Overview

The mazalim (grievances) was an administrative judicial institution, which the caliph convened or for which he appointed a judge as deputy, to hear complaints of injustice that went beyond the work of ordinary judgement. 2

The Abbasid caliph al-Mahdi took an interest in it, and he had a house made with an iron window through which complaints were thrown. 2

Al-Muhtadi built a dome with four doors, which he called "the dome of grievances," where he sat to hear both the general public and the privileged. 3

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. Tarikh al-Dawla al-Abbasiyya — Muhammad Suhayl Taqqush (7th ed. 2009) , p. 166
  2. Tarikh al-Dawla al-Abbasiyya — Muhammad Suhayl Taqqush (7th ed. 2009) , p.76
  3. Tarikh al-Dawla al-Abbasiyya — Muhammad Suhayl Taqqush (7th ed. 2009) , p.166
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “The mazalim (courts of grievances)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/mazalim/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-22.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.