A sick pilgrim who could not perform the circumambulation of ifada

حاج مريض لم يطف طواف الإفاضة

A question from a sick pilgrim who stood at Arafat, stayed at Mina, stoned and shaved, then went home without the circumambulation of ifada or the running, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that he remains partly in the state of ihram and is not 'prevented' (muhsar), and must complete the rites himself, appointing a proxy only if he becomes permanently unable. The Department answered that the circumambulation of ifada is a pillar without which the pilgrim does not leave hajj, and its time never runs out, quoting al-Nawawi and al-Khatib al-Shirbini's Mughni al-Muhtaj that whoever still owes it remains in ihram. It said the questioner has made the first release, which lifts every restriction of ihram except those relating to women; if able, he must return to Makkah, owing nothing for passing the miqat since he is still in ihram, perform the circumambulation and the running if his hajj was tamattu', and so make the second release. If he is unable and has become permanently incapable (ma'dub), he may appoint someone to perform the circumambulation and running for him, quoting al-Shihab al-Ramli's fatwas that this is allowed and indeed required, since if a proxy suffices for the whole rite, it suffices all the more for part of it. On the farewell circumambulation, it noted that scholars differ on whether it is obligatory or recommended and took the recommended view for ease, so no sacrifice is due; and it said he is not prevented, because illness is not a cause of prevention and he had already stood at Arafat and continued his hajj.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Summary

A question from a sick pilgrim who stood at Arafat, stayed at Mina, stoned and shaved, then went home without the circumambulation of ifada or the running, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that he remains partly in the state of ihram and is not 'prevented' (muhsar), and must complete the rites himself, appointing a proxy only if he becomes permanently unable. 1

The question

The questioner said he stood at Arafat, stayed overnight at Mina, stoned the pillars and shaved, but was ill and could not perform the circumambulation of ifada, the running between Safa and Marwa or the farewell circumambulation; he had stipulated on entering ihram that he would leave it wherever he was held back, returned home, and cannot travel; he asked whether he counts as prevented. 1

The answer

The Department answered that the circumambulation of ifada is a pillar without which the pilgrim does not leave hajj, and its time never runs out, quoting al-Nawawi and al-Khatib al-Shirbini's Mughni al-Muhtaj that whoever still owes it remains in ihram. 1 It said the questioner has made the first release, which lifts every restriction of ihram except those relating to women; if able, he must return to Makkah, owing nothing for passing the miqat since he is still in ihram, perform the circumambulation and the running if his hajj was tamattu', and so make the second release. 1 If he is unable and has become permanently incapable (ma'dub), he may appoint someone to perform the circumambulation and running for him, quoting al-Shihab al-Ramli's fatwas that this is allowed and indeed required, since if a proxy suffices for the whole rite, it suffices all the more for part of it. 1 On the farewell circumambulation, it noted that scholars differ on whether it is obligatory or recommended and took the recommended view for ease, so no sacrifice is due; and it said he is not prevented, because illness is not a cause of prevention and he had already stood at Arafat and continued his hajj. 1

About this record

Jordan's General Iftaa Department published this fatwa on aliftaa.jo as no. 3826, dated 7 November 2023. 1 The museum records this text as a historical document attributed to the body or scholar that issued it; it issues no ruling of its own.

Opinions on the question

The question: Is the farewell circumambulation obligatory, so that omitting it requires a sacrifice, or only recommended?

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Obligatory

Jordan's General Iftaa Department noted that some scholars hold the farewell circumambulation to be obligatory, without naming them.
More opinions (1)

Connections

Explore the connections

About
Rulings on the hajj· Ihsar (being prevented from completing the rite)· Niyaba (representation and agency: contractual and legal, and substitution in worship)

People and things also explored

Conditions for performing hajj or umrah on behalf of a sick person· Hajj first, or a child first?· Rulings on the hajj· Ihsar (being prevented from completing the rite)· Niyaba (representation and agency: contractual and legal, and substitution in worship)

Sources

  1. Jordan's General Iftaa Department (aliftaa.jo) , fatwa 3826

Original page

Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “A sick pilgrim who could not perform the circumambulation of ifada”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/fatwa-aliftaa-jo-sick-pilgrim-who-missed-tawaf-al-ifada/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-01.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

Conditions for performing hajj or umrah on behalf of a sick person

A question on appointing someone to perform umrah for a sick father with the intention of his recovery, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that proxy performance is allowed for someone permanently unable, with his permission, and that intending recovery is fine. The Department answered that hajj and umrah are obligatory once in a lifetime, and that someone unable to perform them because of an illness not expected to pass, or old age, may appoint another to perform them, and must do so for the obligatory one, citing al-Shirwani's gloss on Tuhfat al-Muhtaj and the definition of the permanently disabled (al-ma'dub) in al-Nawawi's al-Majmu'. It required the disabled person's permission, since he is alive with his own will and choice, quoting al-Nawawi's Rawdat al-Talibin that hajj for him without his permission does not count, and said a passing illness expected to heal does not allow a proxy. It said there is nothing wrong with the umrah being intended for recovery, since seeking recovery is a supplication and offering a good deed before supplicating is recommended. It concluded that someone who became able and then lost the ability must appoint a proxy, that the disabled may appoint one for voluntary hajj and umrah too, and that the proxy must have the person's permission and must already have performed hajj or umrah for himself.