Accept the terms or fight to the end?

At the siege of Jerusalem the Christian leaders offered to hand over the city if Saladin guaranteed the safety of its people and their property for a ransom. The decision: accept surrender on terms, or keep fighting at the risk of city and people?

The positions

Saladin and his commanders

the city and its people are dearer than the spoils of revenge

The evidence

he took the ransom, pilgrims and residents left safe, the city without blood

Sources: person/salah-al-din-yusuf-ibn-ayyubplace/jerusalem

the terms-refusers

the foe is spent; more pressure takes everything

The evidence

they judged the siege had worn the garrison near collapse

Sources: exhibit/pathway-g11-chw3m-crusades-muslim-side

You decide

Which decision would you have advised in the war council? Write your reason.

Saved on this device